Customer churn is
quite topical for companies with subscription based offerings. Apart from the
old adage around the costs of customer acquisition vs retention, many tech
companies not only have a dependency on scale for profitability, they see the
inverse of marginal returns with incremental subscription. While acquisition
initiatives are often obvious, retention has historically been taken for
granted. Churn, defined as “number of individuals moving out of a
collective group”, is a challenge and rife in industries with subscription
services, like mobile telecoms. Churn prediction has thus gained in
popularity over the years. A lot of analytical resources is directed
toward churn propensity modelling and there’s been much progress made in
exploiting the results. I refer to ths conceptually & focus on alternate approaches to the subject as a whole.
Broadly, regression or
classification tree techniques are applied on a few variables, some number
crunching takes place usually resulting in a propensity score by subscriber.
These techniques perform exceptionally well on two main dimensions:
1) Duration, 2)
Consumption.
While the approach to customer retention should be seen
holistically, if you are considering or busy with propensity modelling in the
manner described above, let’s first start with the implications of the
‘subscription economy’. Engagement or disengagement no longer follows a smooth
profile. Analysing consumption data alone, as the leading indicator, is
onerous. What are the causals?
I like to think of the concept as one would operate a gas fuelled burner. You'd notice in turning of the flame, one would tends to turn of the valve at the gas bottle first. This allows the gas in the pipes to drain through. Finally the tap at the cooker is shut off. Now looking at the flames alone, one couldn’t be blamed for suggesting the dying flames was a gradual process. In reality, the point of termination (turning of the valve) was an instantaneous action.
A
drop in usage, or change in behaviour oftentimes follows a trigger. These rank
among the top:
- A drop
in network quality
- Better
price form competitor
- or a
bad experience at one of the contact points.
But
this is not unknown. In defence the call for 360 degree customer data has been
going on for some time now. Historically, the emphasis in ERP systems has been
accounting rather than activity. Finding accurate customer activity
repositories is rare. Yet we can, given knowledge of the above triggers, still
do more than calculate propensity scores. Should you invest in hindsight
intelligence or accurate & timely service level feedback?
More
often than not, service level reports exist. These metrics spark a tactical
conversation. Possibly because, unlike our machine counterparts, we thrive on
aggregates. Actions on aggregate information, seldom meet the real time needs
of our value seeking customer. But we are living in a time when data has moved
from main frames to the cloud. Analytical software is available freely and code
can be reused with minor adjustments. We thus have opportunities to move from
static estimations, to programmed activities and finally machine learning.
Statistical process modelling, illustrated below, opens prospects for live
engagement. We can ping and reach out to customers, proactively, with a whole
host of customized messages, not just on name, but purpose. Live data begins
with collation, then analysis and finally action.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments: